A Student Perspective: Reflecting on the End of the English Major

Authored by Fatou Lemon

Administrative Intern to the Dean of University Libraries

Political Science Major, 2024

After attending the “Reflecting on “The End of the English Major,” event hosted by the Stony Brook University Libraries, it is clear that the headline of the original article, The End of The English Major,” written by Nathan Hellerthe was misleading. 

Watch a recording of the event hosted by the University Libraries on 4/19/23

In 2019, Nathan Heller published an article titled “The End of the English Major” in The New Yorker, which sparked a conversation about the state of the humanities and the relevance of English literature in today’s society. The article presents a thought-provoking perspective on the challenges facing English departments in universities across the United States, and it explores the reasons why fewer students are choosing to major in English at Arizona State University.

Heller cites the decline of the English major is the perception that studying literature is not practical or useful. In today’s society, many people value degrees that lead to immediate and lucrative job opportunities. This trend is reflected in the growth of STEM fields, which are seen as providing more practical skills and better job prospects. Heller argues that the humanities, and English in particular, have been unfairly maligned as impractical and frivolous, when in fact they provide valuable skills in critical thinking, communication, and empathy.

Heller also notes that the traditional canon of English literature, which has been the focus of English departments for decades, is no longer seen as relevant or representative of the diverse society we live in. Many students, especially those from marginalized communities, feel alienated by this principle, which often privileges the perspectives of white, male authors. This has led to a push for more diverse and inclusive curricula, as well as a reevaluation of the canon itself.

Despite these challenges, Heller suggests that the decline of the English major does not mean the end of the discipline. He argues that English departments can adapt by offering more interdisciplinary courses, partnering with other departments, and embracing new technologies. Additionally, he notes that there is still a demand for English majors in fields like journalism, publishing, and education.

Andrew Newman’s (Professor and Chair of Early American Studies; History of Education; Native American Studies; Media and Memory Studies at Stony Brook University) response to Nathan Heller’s article not only addresses the challenges facing English departments but also has socio-political implications that are worth discussing. In his response, Newman argues that English departments are far from irrelevant, and they continue to play a vital role in higher education, having a broader implication for society as a whole.

Firstly, Newman notes that the study of English literature develops critical thinking and communication skills that are in high demand in many industries. However, these skills are not just useful for individual success but are also crucial for a healthy and functioning democracy. In a society where misinformation is rampant, and political discourse is often polarized and contentious, the ability to think critically and communicate effectively is essential. English departments, therefore, play an important role in promoting these skills and in fostering a more informed and engaged citizenry.

Secondly, Newman’s response highlights the importance of diversity and inclusion in higher education. He underscores the notion Heller presents that many students, especially those from marginalized communities, feel alienated by the traditional canon of English literature, which often privileges the perspectives of white, male authors. English departments, therefore, have a responsibility to diversify their curricula and to promote a range of voices and perspectives. This not only benefits students but also has broader implications for society. In a diverse and inclusive society, it is essential that people are exposed to a range of experiences and perspectives and feel empowered to participate in discourse. English departments can play a crucial role in promoting this diversity.

Finally, Newman argues that the study of English literature promotes empathy and understanding. Literature exposes us to different perspectives and allows us to connect with people from different backgrounds and cultures. In a society that is increasingly polarized and divided, these skills are more important than ever. English departments, therefore, play an important role in fostering a more empathetic and understanding society.

One of the key points of Newman’s response is that English departments have always been more than just a pipeline to specific careers. He argues that English majors develop skills that are valuable in a range of professions, including critical thinking, communication, and problem-solving. These skills are in high demand in many industries, including the tech sector, which is increasingly recognizing the importance of the liberal arts.

Newman also notes that English departments have adapted to the changing needs of students and the workforce by expanding their curricula and embracing interdisciplinary approaches. Many English departments now offer courses that focus on topics like digital humanities, environmental studies, and global literatures. These courses not only attract more students but also better reflect the diverse interests and needs of today’s students.

In conclusion, Newman’s response to Heller’s article has broader socio-political implications that are worth considering. English departments not only provide students with valuable skills but also play an important role in promoting critical thinking, diversity, and empathy. These skills are essential not only for individual success but also for a healthy and functioning democracy. In a world that is increasingly interrelated, English departments have a vital role to play in fostering a more informed, engaged, and empathetic citizenry.

Jamie Saragossi

Jamie Saragossi

Interim Associate Dean, Collection Strategy & Management at Stony Brook University Libraries
Jamie is the Interim Associate Dean, Collection Strategy & Management.
email: jamie.saragossi@stonybrook.edu
Jamie Saragossi
Posted in About Us, Arts & Humanities, Education, Technology